|
Women's Law ProjectMission: The Women's Law Project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. To this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. Learn more about WLP.
|
Federal Judge Rules Pittsburgh Clinic Buffer Zone Ordinance ConstitutionalOn February 22, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a long-awaited ruling denying clinic protester Mary Kathryn Brown’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the Pittsburgh Buffer Zone Ordinance. In a published 69-page opinion in Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, C.A. No. 06-0393 (W.D. Pa.), U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer upheld the constitutionality of the buffer zone ordinance and refused to order the Pittsburgh police to stop enforcing the ordinance against Mary Brown. In a separate opinion, Judge Fischer granted in part and denied in part the City’s motion to dismiss. The District Court held that “the Ordinance is a facially constitutional
regulation of the time, place, and manner of protected speech, according to the
Supreme Court holding in Hill v. Colorado.” The Court also
determined that “the terms of the Ordinance are not unconstitutionally
vague on their face or as applied to Brown nor are they overbroad. . . . The
enforcement of the Ordinance against Brown does not substantially burden her
right to free exercise of her religion. In fact, she continues in her activities
to this day. . . . Brown has not shown that she has or will suffer irreparable
injury by the denial of relief because she [has] not proven any direct constitutional
harm to her rights.” |
|
|
|
||